“In the era of religious pluralism,
Christianity’s exclusive claims are considered inappropriately narrow, even
intolerant. What is more, pluralism itself, has ironically, become the
criterion by which all truth claims are judged” (Köstenberger and Kruger 2010).
First century Judaism prized law-keeping and scrupulous observance of religious
customs. By contrast, Jesus claimed that allegiance to Him was the way. Some
have tried to argue that “way,” “truth,” and “life” should be read together as
“the way of life.” Yet John elsewhere uses multiple terms that remain distinct
when linked with the conjunction “and” (e.g., John 2:14; 14:6). Carson rightly
notes that in the larger context Jesus is claiming to be “the Savior (John
4:42) and the Lamb of God (John 1:29, 34), the one who speaks that those who
are in the graves hear His voice and come forth (5:28-29). He so mediates God’s
truth and God’s life that He is the very way to God, the one who alone can say,
No one comes to the Father except through Me” (Carson, 1991, 491).
“In the OT, people expressed their
faith in God by keeping the law given through Moses; now that Jesus has come,
[He] is the way. In the monotheistic Jewish world and polytheistic Greco-Roman
culture of the first century, as well as in today’s pluralistic climate, Jesus’
message is plain: [He] is not one among many different options—[He] is the way”
(Andreas Köstenberger).
Furthermore,
the resurrection of Jesus from the dead is uncontested historical evidence of
the uniqueness of Christ.
No comments:
Post a Comment